Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TRUEPILOT, serial 78946144, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TRUEPILOTSerial 78946144 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Aug 07, 2006
The record shows that the mark “TRUEPILOT” is dead; it was abandoned because the owner, Bristol‑Myers Squibb Company, did not file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was filed on August 7, 2006 and was published for opposition on August 28, 2007, with the Notice of Allowance issued on November 20, 2007. The goods covered are pharmaceutical preparations for human use, including treatments for obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and many other conditions, as listed in Class 005. A similar name used in the same or closely related pharmaceutical field would raise the closest record‑based concern, while use in unrelated industries would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on August 11, 2008. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer protected, but the detailed pharmaceutical scope still signals a potential concern if used in that area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.