Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for LOVE FLOWERS, serial 78948075, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE FLOWERS
Serial 78948075 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Flat Creek Mountain, Inc.
Class 021 -
Filed Aug 09, 2006

The record shows that “LOVE FLOWERS” is an abandoned application (status “dead”) filed by Flat Creek Mountain, Inc., a North Carolina corporation, and it never entered registration; the last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on February 1 2010 after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was applied for on the Principal Register and covered a very broad list of household and decorative items in International Class 021—everything from artificial eggs, bakeware and barware to bath sponges, bird feeders and candle holders—so a similar name used for any of those kinds of products would present the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “love” or “flowers,” especially outside the listed goods. The prosecution history shows the usual sequence of a notice of allowance, several extensions for filing a use statement, and ultimately abandonment when no use was shown; there is no indication of oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market similar household or decorative goods under a comparable name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search