Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLORES CAMPO DEL SOL, serial 78966128, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLORES CAMPO DEL SOLSerial 78966128 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: INTERNATIONAL FLORAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Class 031 -
Filed Sep 01, 2006
The record shows that “FLORES CAMPO DEL SOL” is no longer active – it was abandoned after publication when the applicant filed an express abandonment, with the last meaningful status event being the abandonment notice mailed on Oct 12 2007; the owner listed is International Floral Distributors, Inc., a Missouri corporation. The application covered only class 031, specifically “cut flowers, namely, cut flowers sold by and among growers, distributors, mass‑market retailers and retail florist; cut flowers sold at retail,” so a similar name would raise the closest concern if you’re also dealing in cut‑flower sales or retail. The record does not give the owner any control over every possible use of the words “flores,” “campo,” or “sol” in other industries. The prosecution history shows the application moved through normal examination steps, received an examiner’s amendment on Sep 5 2007, and was approved for publication before the abandonment, but it never reached registration. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to market cut flowers under a similar name, but the risk is limited to that specific product category.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.