Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ZEN FLOWERS, serial 79020806, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ZEN FLOWERSSerial 79020806 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Spacey, Simon A.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 031 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Oct 01, 2004
Registered Jul 17, 2007
The record shows that “ZEN FLOWERS” is a dead, cancelled registration on the Principal Register, owned by Simon A. Spacey. The mark covered a range of goods and services that include audio and video recordings about flowers, instructional software, printed materials such as books and brochures, actual flowers and arrangements, and related educational and floral services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same categories—especially for products or services that involve flower design, arrangements, or related educational content. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “ZEN” or “FLOWERS” outside those listed goods and services. The latest event is a notification of the cancellation of the international registration on April 25 2025. No opposition, cancellation, or court action appears in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement signal. If you’re thinking of a similar name, be aware that the cancelled mark still signals that the owner once claimed rights in these specific areas, and using the same name for similar goods or services could still pose a risk.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.