Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BANDAI ACTION KITS UNIVERSAL CUP BAKUC, serial 79032671, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BANDAI ACTION KITS UNIVERSAL CUP BAKUCSerial 79032671 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Kabushiki Kaisha Bandai; (BANDAI Co., Ltd.)
Class 028 -
Filed Sep 26, 2006
Registered Jan 15, 2008
The record shows that “BANDAI ACTION KITS UNIVERSAL CUP BAKUC” is cancelled – the U.S. registration was terminated on September 26 2016 after the underlying Madrid‑Protocol international registration was cancelled, and the owner listed is Kabushiki Kaisha Bandai (BANDAI Co., Ltd.). The registration covered Class 028 goods – toy action figures, toy construction sets, toy model hobby craft kits, jigsaw puzzles, dolls, marionettes, plush toys, trading‑card game cards and playing cards – so a similar name used on any of those types of toys would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “BANDAI,” “ACTION KITS,” or “UNIVERSAL CUP” in unrelated industries. This was a Principal Register filing; the prosecution history shows an initial refusal in early 2007, a subsequent allowance and registration in January 2008, and later cancellation tied to the international registration’s demise. The latest meaningful event is the September 2016 cancellation, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a toy‑related brand with a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.