Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MISS CASINO QUEEN OF THE UNIVERSE, serial 79049198, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MISS CASINO QUEEN OF THE UNIVERSESerial 79049198 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Let's Talk Entertainment Agency Pty Ltd
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Aug 31, 2007
The record shows the application for MISS CASINO QUEEN OF THE UNIVERSE was abandoned on September 4 2009, so it is not a live or registered mark; the owner listed is Let’s Talk Entertainment Agency Pty Ltd. The filing covered three classes: Class 009 includes computer‑game software that generates wager outcomes, electronic game controllers and media featuring beauty‑and‑modeling competitions; Class 016 covers paper goods such as books, magazines, calendars, greeting cards and other printed materials in the same beauty‑and‑modeling field; Class 041 lists entertainment services like beauty pageants and modeling competitions, including internet voting, gambling services and related advisory services. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those gaming, beauty‑pageant or related entertainment services, but the record does not extend to unrelated products or services. The mark was on the Principal Register, and there is no prosecution history indicating a supplemental‑register amendment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Sep 04 2009, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use a comparable name in gaming or beauty‑pageant contexts, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.