Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for EARTHDREAMS, serial 79053281, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
EARTHDREAMSSerial 79053281 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 004 -
Class 006 -
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 012 -
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 028 -
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 039 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Jan 29, 2008
Registered Feb 09, 2010
The record shows that EARTHDREAMS is a live Principal Register trademark owned by Honda Motor Co., Ltd., with a Section 71 declaration accepted and the most recent status date of March 18 2020. The registration covers a very broad set of goods and services, but the most direct concern for a similar name lies in class 012, which lists motor vehicles such as cars, motorcycles, SUVs and related parts and fittings, as well as engineering and design services for motor vehicles in class 042. Because the mark is limited to those listed categories, the record does not give Honda control over every possible use of the word “EARTHDREAMS” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history contains no supplemental‑register amendment or refusal, so the mark was granted on the Principal Register without that sequence. No enforcement actions, oppositions or cancellations appear in the supplied history. I’d treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for automotive products or services, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.