Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for O, serial 79065488, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OSerial 79065488 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Limited Liability Company "GPM Entertainment television"
Class 001 -
Class 002 -
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 004 -
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 006 -
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Class 011 -
Class 012 -
Class 013 -
Class 014 -
Class 015 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 017 -
Class 018 -
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 022 -
Class 023 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 031 -
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 033 -
Class 034 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 039 -
Class 040 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Apr 03, 2008
The record shows that the mark “O” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Limited Liability Company “GPM Entertainment television,” organized in the Russian Federation. The mark was registered on the Principal Register under a Madrid Protocol international filing, covering a vast array of goods and services from chemicals and pharmaceuticals to clothing, food, and various industrial and consumer products. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those broad categories, especially where the goods or services overlap with the listed classes. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the letter “O.” The prosecution history shows a refusal in May 2009 followed by abandonment in November 2009, with no later maintenance events. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of conflict in the goods and services listed.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.