Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FMR GRUPPO, serial 79066341, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FMR GRUPPOSerial 79066341 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: FMR - ART'E' S.P.A.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 11, 2008
The record shows that “FMR GRUPPO” is a dead U.S. application that was abandoned on June 11, 2018 after the underlying International Registration under the Madrid Protocol was cancelled, and the USPTO has not allowed any revival; the owner listed is FMR ‑ ART'E' S.P.A. The filing covered paper goods and printed matter (class 016), advertising and business services (class 035), education and entertainment services (class 041), and scientific‑technology services (class 042), so a similar name used in any of those areas would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “FMR GRUPPO” outside those listed categories. Although the mark was filed on the Principal Register, the prosecution history shows a series of refusals and a final abandonment rather than a move to the Supplemental Register. The most recent meaningful event is the January 11, 2019 notification of the cancellation of the international registration. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use a similar name for paper, advertising, educational, or scientific‑technology services, but the risk is limited to those specific classes.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.