Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MISS CASINO QUEEN, serial 79066481, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MISS CASINO QUEENSerial 79066481 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Let's Talk Entertainment Agency Pty Ltd
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Dec 19, 2008
Registered Nov 10, 2009
The record shows that “MISS CASINO QUEEN” is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by Let’s Talk Entertainment Agency Pty Ltd, with the cancellation dated December 19 2018 after the underlying international registration was revoked; the mark is no longer live. The registration covered computer‑game software (excluding software for gaming machines), electronic game controllers, audio‑video recordings and downloadable newsletters related to beauty and modelling competitions (Class 009); paper goods such as books, magazines, calendars, greeting cards and stickers in the same field (Class 016); and entertainment services including beauty pageants, modelling competitions with online voting, gambling services and related advisory services (Class 041). A similar name used in these specific areas would raise the closest record‑based concern, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Miss,” “Casino” or “Queen.” The prosecution history shows an initial refusal, followed by approval for registration on the Principal Register, and later a series of invalidations and a final cancellation, but it never moved to the Supplemental Register. The latest meaningful event is the December 2018 cancellation, and no future renewal or deadline is listed. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement actions, so no enforcement signal appears. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark that overlaps the listed gaming‑software, beauty‑competition or gambling services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.