Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for CITIES OF LOVE MOSCOW, I LOVE YOU, serial 79074842, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
CITIES OF LOVE MOSCOW, I LOVE YOUSerial 79074842 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Monsieur Benbihy Emmanuel
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 27, 2009
Registered May 22, 2012
The record shows that the mark “CITIES OF LOVE MOSCOW, I LOVE YOU” was registered on the Principal Register on May 22, 2012 and is now cancelled as of March 27, 2019, with the owner listed as Monsieur Benbihy Emmanuel. The cancellation was triggered by the international registration’s cancellation, and the mark’s status is “dead.” The goods and services covered at the time of registration were extensive, including paper goods and printed matter, clothing, communication services, and education and entertainment services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same categories, especially where the mark was used on printed items or apparel. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only covers the specific goods and services listed. The latest meaningful event is the cancellation on March 27, 2019, and no enforcement actions are recorded. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, but the historical coverage in these classes still suggests a potential concern if the new use overlaps those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.