Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TOPPERS, serial 79080172, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TOPPERSSerial 79080172 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: TOPPERS Project, Inc. c/o Japan Embedded Systems Technology Association
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jan 15, 2010
Registered Mar 22, 2011
The record shows that the mark “TOPPERS” is live and registered on the Principal Register under serial 79080172, owned by TOPPERS Project, Inc. c/o Japan Embedded Systems Technology Association, a nonprofit in Japan. The goods and services listed cover computer programs for operating systems and middleware, software development tools for embedded computing, educational seminars and exhibitions in embedded computing, information services on computer technologies, and licensing of intellectual property. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these areas, especially software and educational services related to embedded systems. The record does not give the mark control over all uses of the word “TOPPERS.” The most recent maintenance event was the acceptance of a Section 71 declaration on May 16 2022. No oppositions, cancellations, or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone looking to use a similar name, the presence of this active registration in closely related fields suggests a meaningful risk of confusion.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.