Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for DULUX ADDING COLOUR TO PEOPLE'S LIVES, serial 79080974, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DULUX ADDING COLOUR TO PEOPLE'S LIVESSerial 79080974 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Akzo Nobel Coatings International B.V.
Class 002 -
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 037 -
Class 040 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 10, 2010
The record shows that “DULUX ADDING COLOUR TO PEOPLE’S LIVES” is not a live filing – it was abandoned and later cancelled, with the final status date of Feb 11 2020, and the owner listed as Akzo Nobel Coatings International B.V. The goods and services cover paints, varnishes, lacquers, thinners, colour‑mixing machines, hand tools for applying those finishes, advisory and information services about building refurbishment and decorating, paint‑mixing and colour‑scheming services, and related printed publications, all recorded in classes 002, 007, 008, 016, 037, 040 and 042. A similar name used for anything in the paint‑or‑decorating arena would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The prosecution history shows an initial refusal in mid‑2010 followed by abandonment notices in early 2011 and a final disposition in 2012, leading to the eventual cancellation noted in 2020; the mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by a third party, or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand paint‑related products or services with a similar phrase.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.