Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for UNI JELLY, serial 79103513, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
UNI JELLYSerial 79103513 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: NITTO DENKO CORPORATION
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Sep 06, 2011
Registered Sep 25, 2012
The record shows that “UNI JELLY” is no longer active – it was cancelled on September 6 2021 after the underlying International Registration was cancelled, and the owner listed is NITTO DENKO CORPORATION, a corporation organized in Japan. The registration covered only class 005 pharmaceutical goods, specifically jelly‑like or gummy‑like drug delivery systems and related preparations for treating asthma, diabetes, allergies, colds, antibiotics, vaccines and dysphagia; a similar name used for those kinds of products would be the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “UNI” or “JELLY” outside that narrow pharmaceutical scope. This was a Principal Register filing that faced an initial refusal, was amended, entered the register in 2012, and later was cancelled when the Madrid Protocol registration was invalidated. The prosecution history contains no notices of opposition, cancellation actions by a third party, or other enforcement activity, so the supplied history shows none. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a similar name for pharmaceutical or drug‑delivery products, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.