Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAILING REMIXED, serial 79104607, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAILING REMIXEDSerial 79104607 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: OC Sport UK Limited
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 07, 2011
The record shows that “SAILING REMIXED” is not a live mark – the USPTO lists it as a dead application that was abandoned because the underlying International Registration was cancelled, with the final status date of March 7 2021 and the last abandonment notice mailed on June 26 2012. The owner named in the record is OC Sport UK Limited, a UK‑based company. The application covered a very broad set of goods, from cosmetics and cleaning products (class 003) to electronic equipment, clothing, leather goods, jewellery, printed matter, and online entertainment and education services (classes 009, 014, 016, 018, 025, 028, 041). If you were to use a similar name for products in any of those categories, the record would present the closest area of concern because the listed goods directly overlap. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Sailing Remix” in other, unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows a refusal in 2011 followed by abandonment rather than a move to the Supplemental Register, so there is no supplemental‑register nuance to consider. No opposition, cancellation, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I’d treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in any of the listed classes, but the record alone doesn’t block uses outside those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.