Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAPFIRE P R O F E S S I O N A L, serial 79107207, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAPFIRE P R O F E S S I O N A LSerial 79107207 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Sapfire Group Limited Liability Company
Class 001 -
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 004 -
Class 021 -
Filed Nov 18, 2011
The record shows that “SAPFIRE P R O F E S S I O N A L” is a dead application that was abandoned on March 14, 2021 after the International Registration it relied on was cancelled, and no petition to revive was filed; the owner listed is Sapfire Group Limited Liability Company. The filing covered a very wide range of goods in classes 001, 003, 004 and 021, including industrial chemicals, cosmetics and cleaning preparations, fuels and waxes, and a variety of household items such as buckets, bottles, and decorative containers. Because the record is limited to those specific descriptions, a similar name used on unrelated products would be a farther concern, but a use that falls within any of those categories would raise the closest record‑based risk. The prosecution history shows a refusal in early 2012 followed by abandonment for failure to respond, but the mark never entered the Supplemental Register—it remained on the Principal Register and was simply refused and later cancelled. The latest meaningful event is the status change to “abandoned” on March 14, 2021, and the file contains no notices of opposition, cancellation or court action. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use “SAPFIRE PROFESSIONAL” for chemicals, cosmetics, fuels or similar household goods, because the abandoned application still signals that the USPTO found a conflict in those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.