Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GRESMALT GRUPPO CERAMICHE, serial 79118191, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GRESMALT GRUPPO CERAMICHESerial 79118191 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: GRUPPO CERAMICHE GRESMALT S.P.A.
Class 019 -
Filed Mar 02, 2012
Registered Dec 17, 2013
The record shows a cancelled (dead) Principal Register registration for GRESMALT GRUPPO CERAMICHE, owned by GRUPPO CERAMICHE GRESMALT S.P.A., a joint‑stock company organized in Italy; the cancellation was recorded on Mar 3 2022 after the underlying International Registration was invalidated. The registration covered only Class 019 goods—stones, artificial stone, granite, marble, building stone, various non‑metal floor and wall tiles, roofing coverings, bricks, slabs and related building‑material products—so a similar name used on those types of products would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “GRESMALT” or “GRUPPO CERAMICHE” in unrelated fields. Because the mark was on the Principal Register, the prosecution history reflects a standard examination that ultimately led to cancellation rather than a Supplemental Register filing. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to brand building‑material items similar to those listed.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.