Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PIERRE J CADIVA BEAUTY CONCEPT, serial 79123774, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PIERRE J CADIVA BEAUTY CONCEPTSerial 79123774 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Tan Chin Choo and Cassandra Soh Xiang Ning
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Jun 22, 2012
Registered May 06, 2014
The record shows that “PIERRE J CADIVA BEAUTY CONCEPT” was registered on the Principal Register on May 6 2014 and is now dead, having been cancelled on June 22 2022 because the corresponding international registration was cancelled. The owners listed are Tan Chin Choo and Cassandra Soh Xiang Ning. The mark covers a wide range of cosmetics and beauty‑care goods, including adhesive tapes for false hair, lotions, creams, perfumes, and related preparations. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the cosmetics and personal‑care sector, especially where the goods or services are identical or very similar to those listed. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the goods and services described. The prosecution history shows a straightforward registration with no supplemental register moves, and the last meaningful event was the cancellation in 2022. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, but the extensive cosmetics coverage still suggests a meaningful concern if the new use is in the same field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.