Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FUN, serial 79128193, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FUNSerial 79128193 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: JOEONE CO.,LTD.
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Feb 26, 2013
The record shows that the “FUN” application filed by JOEONE CO.,LTD., a corporation organized in China, is dead – it was abandoned on Feb 27 2023 because the underlying International Registration was cancelled, and no revival is allowed. The only listed goods are in International Class 025 and cover a wide range of clothing items such as shirts, suits, knitwear, jackets, leather apparel, t‑shirts, underwear, shoes, hats, hosiery, gloves, neckties, wedding dresses and related accessories. Because the concern is limited to apparel, a similar name used for clothing would be the closest record‑based risk, while uses in unrelated fields (for example, software or food) fall farther from the scope shown. The prosecution history reflects a refusal and subsequent abandonment tied to the loss of the Madrid Protocol registration, but the mark never reached the Supplemental Register. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice dated Feb 27 2023, and the file contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement activity is visible. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for any new clothing brand that wants to use “FUN,” but the record does not control every possible use of the word.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.