Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BRIERS, serial 79168494, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BRIERSSerial 79168494 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Smart Garden Products Limited
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Feb 10, 2015
Registered Jun 07, 2016
The record shows that the mark “BRIERS” is no longer live; it was cancelled on February 11 2025 because the international registration was cancelled in whole or in part. The owner listed is Smart Garden Products Limited, a limited company organized in the United Kingdom. The cancelled registration covered a narrow range of protective clothing and gardening gloves, specifically articles of protective clothing adapted for resistance to abrasion, blade cut, puncture or tear, and gardening gloves. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same area of protective clothing and gardening accessories. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “BRIERS.” The prosecution history shows no Supplemental Register activity, only a principal registration that was later cancelled. No enforcement actions such as oppositions or cancellations after publication appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status means the mark is not currently enforceable, but the specific goods listed still represent a potential area of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.