Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for READY TO LUNCH, serial 79186099, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
READY TO LUNCHSerial 79186099 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: ARGOTEC S.R.L.
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 031 -
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Oct 27, 2015
Registered Oct 09, 2018
The record shows that the mark “READY TO LUNCH” is currently dead, having been cancelled because the registrant, ARGOTEC S.R.L., a limited liability company organized in Italy, failed to file a required declaration under Section 71. The mark was once registered on the Principal Register on October 9, 2018, covering a wide range of food‑related goods and services, including processed meats, staple foods, light beverages, advertising and business services, education and entertainment related to food, scientific and technology services for the food industry, and restaurant and hotel services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those food‑service or related advertising areas. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the listed goods and services. The most recent meaningful event was the cancellation on April 25, 2025, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of confusion in the food and hospitality sectors.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.