Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for B EXIT TOP SHOP ONLINE, serial 79187059, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
B EXIT TOP SHOP ONLINESerial 79187059 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: CIACCIA MICHELE
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 014 -
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 028 -
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 033 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Nov 05, 2015
The record shows that the mark “B EXIT TOP SHOP ONLINE” is dead and was abandoned by its owner, Michele CIACCIA, an individual organized in Italy. The application, filed on November 5 2015, was for a Principal Register registration under the Madrid Protocol and was refused, leading to abandonment. The goods and services listed cover a wide range of items, from cosmetics and cleaning products to precious metals, jewelry, clothing, household goods, staple foods, beverages, and a broad array of advertising and business services. A similar name would raise the closest concern for uses that fall within any of those categories, especially if the new use involves selling or advertising consumer goods online. The record does not grant control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the abandoned application’s scope. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on November 6 2025. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of confusion in the listed goods and services, though it does not preclude all other uses.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.