Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for OPENONE, serial 79187338, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
OPENONESerial 79187338 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: MÜMIN GENÇOGLU
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 16, 2015
Registered May 01, 2018
The record shows that “OPENONE” is a live Principal Register service mark owned by MÜMIN GENÇOGLU, with registration number 5455524 issued on May 1 2018 and a Section 71 and 15 declaration accepted on Dec 9 2024. The mark covers a wide range of services in classes 035 (advertising, marketing, trade‑fair organization and related data‑handling), 038 (radio‑television broadcasting, telecommunications, satellite and internet data transmission), 041 (educational seminars on metal‑working, telecom conferences, publishing and media production) and 042 (scientific research, material testing, meteorological and engineering consulting). A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those advertised or communication‑related services, because the record’s protection is limited to the listed categories and does not extend to every possible use of the word “OPENONE.” The latest meaningful event is the acceptance of the Section 71 renewal notice in December 2024; no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions appear in the history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning to offer comparable advertising, broadcasting, educational or scientific‑technology services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.