Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for KKCG VISION BEYOND THE OBVIOUS, serial 79189030, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
KKCG VISION BEYOND THE OBVIOUSSerial 79189030 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: KKCG AG
Class 004 -
Class 006 -
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Class 012 -
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 039 -
Class 040 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Dec 01, 2015
Registered Mar 27, 2018
The record shows that “KKCG VISION BEYOND THE OBVIOUS” is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by KKCG AG, a Cyprus‑organized PLC, and its registration was terminated on 11 Oct 2024 with subsequent total invalidation notices in 2025 and a final cancellation of the international registration on 25 Jun 2026. The mark was granted for a very broad set of goods and services, most of which fall in the energy‑industry sphere – natural gas, fuels, oil‑field equipment, metal components for oil and gas, extraction machinery, financial and consulting services for the energy sector, and related advertising, insurance and technology services. Because the covered items are concentrated on energy‑related products and services, a similar name used in that field would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the listed scope. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording, and the prosecution history shows only an examiner’s amendment before the mark entered the Principal Register; it never moved to the Supplemental Register. The supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation, or court actions, so no enforcement signal appears. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that will be used for energy‑sector goods or services, but the risk is lower for unrelated industries.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.