Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for E, serial 79226102, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ESerial 79226102 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: ECZACIBASI HOLDING ANONIM SIRKETI
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 006 -
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Class 011 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 040 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Mar 22, 2017
Registered Aug 13, 2019
The record shows that the mark “E” was registered on the Principal Register on August 13, 2019 under serial 79226102, but it was cancelled on February 27, 2026 because the registrant, ECZACIBASI HOLDING ANONIM SIRKETI, failed to file a Section 71 declaration. The goods and services listed are extensive, covering cosmetics, cleaning products, pharmaceuticals, metal goods, machinery, scientific instruments, medical and beauty services, and many others. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these broad categories, especially where the goods or services overlap with the original description. The cancellation does not mean the wording is free for all uses; it only removes the specific registration. The most recent event is the cancellation itself; no further maintenance dates are supplied. No opposition, cancellation, or court actions appear in the history, so the supplied record shows no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of conflict in the listed goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.