Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FARCOM, serial 79226842, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FARCOMSerial 79226842 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: FARCOM A.E.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Oct 10, 2017
The record shows that the “FARCOM” application is dead – it was abandoned on Oct 9 2018 because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and no later filing revived it; the owner listed is FARCOM A.E., a Greek SA. The only goods covered are in International Class 3 and include toiletries, cosmetics, body‑care and beauty preparations, oral‑hygiene items, perfumery, baby shampoos and lotions, hair‑care products, deodorants, antiperspirants, hair dyes, styling preparations, shampoos and lotions. A later‑filed mark using the same word for similar cosmetics or personal‑care products would run into the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields (for example, software or food services) would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of “FARCOM.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks the refusal and subsequent abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on Oct 9 2018, and the supplied history shows no opposition, cancellation or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a cosmetics‑related brand using the same name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.