Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NOVA, serial 79230264, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NOVASerial 79230264 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Obshchestvo s Ogranichennoy Otvetstvennostyu "Kombainovy zavod "Rostselmash"
Class 007 -
Filed Dec 19, 2017
The record shows that the mark “NOVA” is dead; it was abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Obshchestvo s Ogranichennoy Otvetstvennostyu “Kombainovy zavod “Rostselmash”, a limited liability company organized in the Russian Federation. The mark was filed under the Madrid Protocol on December 19, 2017 and was registered internationally on the same date, but the U.S. application was refused and later abandoned on November 30, 2018. The goods covered are an extensive list of industrial machinery and parts, including shaft couplings, converters for steelworks, and aerocondensers, among many others. Because the mark is dead, it does not establish control over the word “NOVA” in any context, but the closest concern would be in the same industrial machinery and parts category. The prosecution history shows a refusal followed by abandonment, with no evidence of opposition or enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests that while the mark is no longer active, the extensive goods list could still raise a concern if used in a closely related field.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.