Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for I'M FOOTBALL, serial 79237491, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
I'M FOOTBALLSerial 79237491 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Football Album Limited
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 09, 2018
Registered Sep 10, 2019
The record shows that “I’M FOOTBALL” is a cancelled Principal Register mark owned by Football Album Limited, with the cancellation entered on March 27 2026 because the registrant failed to file an acceptable Section 71 declaration; no later maintenance events are listed. The registration covered Class 009 software for instant messaging, file sharing and VOIP communications, Class 038 telecommunications and electronic messaging services, and Class 042 temporary‑use online software for messaging, video conferencing and e‑commerce functions, so a similar name used in those digital‑communication or software contexts would present the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “I’M FOOTBALL,” especially outside the listed tech‑service areas. The prosecution history shows an initial refusal, an amendment, and eventual registration, but the later Section 71 lapse led to cancellation rather than a Supplemental Register filing. The supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation, or court actions, so no enforcement signal appears. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in the same software‑or‑communication services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.