Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for COSTA SMERALDA, serial 79242268, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
COSTA SMERALDASerial 79242268 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: SERVIZI CONSORTILI COSTA SMERALDA S.P.A.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 012 -
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 039 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jun 08, 2018
The record shows a live, pending application for the mark COSTA SMERALDA owned by SERVIZI CONSORTILI COSTA SMERALDA S.P.A., filed June 8 2018 under the Principal Register. It covers a very wide range of goods and services, from cosmetics, cleaning products and fragrances (class 003) to electrical and scientific apparatus (class 009), paper goods and printed matter (class 016), clothing and accessories (class 025), advertising and business services (class 035), insurance and financial services (class 036), and many others spanning dozens of classes. A similar name used in any of those listed areas would create the closest record‑based concern, while the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Costa Smeralda.” The prosecution history shows the most recent meaningful event was a non‑final Office action mailed on June 1 2026, indicating the examiner has issued an initial refusal and the applicant must respond. No oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in any of the listed categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.