Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PETAL + PUP, serial 79270500, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PETAL + PUPSerial 79270500 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Petal & Pup Pty Ltd
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Jul 12, 2019
Registered Sep 08, 2020
The record shows that “PETAL + PUP” is a live, registered mark on the Principal Register, owned by Petal & Pup Pty Ltd, a proprietary company organized in Australia. The mark covers downloadable electronic publications about fashion, clothing and music; downloadable video recordings featuring fashion, clothing and music; downloadable electronic applications for video and audio viewing on digital tablets or smartphones; a wide range of clothing items such as skirts, dresses, shirts, jeans, leggings, swimwear, sleepwear, underwear, and sports apparel; and retail and wholesale store services that sell clothing, swimwear, footwear, headgear, accessories, jewelry, handbags, belts, scarves, hats, sunglasses, headbands, hair clips, hair ties, hair bands, and scrunchies. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these same categories of digital media, apparel, and retail services. The record does not give control over every use of the wording in unrelated fields. The latest maintenance event was a limitation from the International Bureau examined on August 12 2026, with no further enforcement actions recorded. For anyone thinking of a similar name, the mark’s active status and broad apparel and digital media coverage suggest a meaningful risk of similarity in those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.