Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for RUBY RAY SYSTEMS, serial 79278626, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
RUBY RAY SYSTEMSSerial 79278626 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Ruby Ray Systems Sàrl
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Nov 05, 2019
Registered Dec 07, 2021
The record shows that “RUBY RAY SYSTEMS” is a live Principal Register trademark owned by Ruby Ray Systems Sàrl, a Swiss limited‑liability company, and it was registered on December 7 2021 after filing on November 5 2019; the most recent meaningful event in the file is that registration notice. The protection covers a very wide range of technical and scientific apparatus in International Class 009—everything from particle accelerators and computer accessories to virtual‑reality headsets with multisensory feedback—and also educational and entertainment services in Class 041, including live and online courses on topics such as history, technology, space exploration and systems theory. A similar name used for products or services that fall within either of those two classes would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “ruby,” “ray,” or “systems.” The prosecution history shows a final refusal in November 2020 that was later overcome, leading to registration on the Principal Register, but it does not imply any special limitation beyond what is listed. No oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market comparable scientific hardware or educational programs under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.