Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NEVA, serial 79282330, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NEVASerial 79282330 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: DILEK TEKSTIL ÜRÜNLERI SANAYI VE TICARETLIMITED SIRKETI
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Filed Nov 22, 2019
Registered Nov 30, 2021
The record shows that the mark “NEVA” is live and registered on the Principal Register under serial 79282330, owned by DILEK TEKSTIL ÜRÜNLERI SANAYI VE TICARETLIMITED SIRKETI, a limited company organized in Turkey. The registration was issued on November 30 2021 and the most recent status event is that same date. The goods covered are extensive, including industrial machinery such as wood‑processing tools, 3D printers, construction equipment, elevators, escalators and cranes (class 007); a wide range of tableware, knives, cutting tools and kitchen utensils (class 008); various cleaning and household appliances and personal care items (class 021); and textile fabrics and household textile goods (class 024). A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these areas, especially where the goods overlap with the listed classes. The record does not grant control over every use of the word “NEVA”; it only protects the specific goods and services listed. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the presence of this active registration in multiple broad classes suggests a meaningful risk of infringement if the new use falls within any of those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.