Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LITE N' EASY SIMPLY EAT WELL, serial 79296147, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LITE N' EASY SIMPLY EAT WELLSerial 79296147 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Matchlow Pty Ltd
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 031 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 039 -
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Sep 24, 2020
Registered Oct 12, 2021
The record shows a live Principal Register registration for “LITE N’ EASY SIMPLY EAT WELL” owned by Matchlow Pty Ltd, filed on September 24 2020 and registered on October 12 2021; the most recent meaningful event is the International Registration renewal on January 13 2023, with an irregularity notice recorded on March 13 2026. The mark covers a broad array of goods and services, chiefly foods and dietary supplements (vitamins, meal‑replacement bars, soups, shakes, prepared meals, pasta, rice, coffee, tea, confectionery, oils, spices, etc.) in classes 005, 029, 030, 031, as well as related retail, advertising, delivery, restaurant, and health‑and‑wellness advisory services in classes 035, 039, 043, 044. A similar name used for any of those food, supplement, or related service offerings would create the closest record‑based concern, but the registration does not extend to unrelated categories such as clothing, software, or non‑food consumer products. The prosecution history shows an initial refusal that was later amended and allowed into the Principal Register, indicating the USPTO ultimately accepted the mark after adjustment. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for food, supplement, or related hospitality services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.