Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for C Y B E R E N I G M A CYBER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, serial 79308464, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
C Y B E R E N I G M A CYBER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Serial 79308464 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Smartcockpit SA
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Oct 12, 2020

The record shows the mark C Y B E R E N I G M A CYBER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT is dead – it was abandoned on Nov 12, 2021 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, with the final abandonment notice mailed on Nov 15, 2021; the owner listed is Smartcockpit SA, a Swiss société anonyme. The filing covered computer‑related software and services in class 009 (e.g., downloadable antivirus, cloud‑computing and chatbot software), class 042 (e.g., data‑compression, web‑page design, IT consultancy and software development) and class 045 (software licensing and related consulting). A similar name would raise the closest concern in these technology‑focused areas, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words elsewhere. The prosecution history shows an initial refusal in April 2021 followed by the applicant’s failure to respond, leading to abandonment; there is no indication of oppositions or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for comparable software or IT services.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search