Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PAPERPAL, serial 79309517, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PAPERPALSerial 79309517 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Cactus Communications Services Pte. Limited
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Feb 03, 2021
The record shows that the mark “PAPERPAL” is dead and was abandoned because the applicant did not respond to an office action. The owner listed is Cactus Communications Services Pte. Limited, a private limited company organized in Singapore. The abandoned application covered two classes: class 009 for computer software platforms and downloadable mobile software that evaluate and improve manuscripts, and class 042 for software‑as‑a‑service and related consulting services for authors and publishers. A similar name would raise the closest concern in these specific software and consulting areas, especially where the services involve manuscript evaluation, proofreading, or copyediting. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only shows a claim in these narrow fields. No enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment on December 5, 2022. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that the abandoned mark still signals a prior claim in manuscript‑related software and services, so caution is advised.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.