Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SCIENTIA CORDE MANU ET MENTE, serial 79313302, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SCIENTIA CORDE MANU ET MENTESerial 79313302 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: University of New South Wales
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 02, 2021
Registered Jun 07, 2022
The record shows that the mark “SCIENTIA CORDE MANU ET MENTE” is live and registered on the Principal Register under serial 79313302, owned by the University of New South Wales. It covers a wide range of educational and scientific services, including academic performance evaluation, continuing business education, advisory services in computer programming, software, systems analysis, environmental protection, immunological product development, and many other science‑related consulting activities. A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same educational and scientific consulting fields, especially where the services are offered to post‑secondary students, businesses, or research organizations. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specified services. The most recent status event is the registration on June 7, 2022, and the next significant date is the auto‑protection date of December 17, 2022. No oppositions, cancellations, or enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone looking to use a similar name, the risk is that in the listed educational and scientific consulting areas the mark could be enforceable.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.