Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FS ITALFERR GRUPPO FERROVIE DELLO STATO ITALIANE, serial 79317838, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FS ITALFERR GRUPPO FERROVIE DELLO STATO ITALIANESerial 79317838 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: FERROVIE DELLO STATO ITALIANE S.p.A.
Class 012 -
Class 037 -
Class 039 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Apr 01, 2021
Registered Feb 06, 2024
The record shows a live, Principal Register registration for “FS ITALFERR GRUPPO FERROVIE DELLO STATO ITALIANE” owned by FERROVIE DELLO STATO ITALIANE S.p.A., a joint‑stock company organized in Italy; it was filed on April 1 2021 and entered registration on February 6 2024, with the most recent meaningful event being a new representative entered on January 3 2025. The goods and services span railway rolling stock (class 012), a broad range of civil‑engineering and railway‑related construction, repair and consulting services (class 037), travel‑booking, passenger and freight rail transportation and related agency services (class 039), and engineering, design and scientific‑technology services for railway infrastructure (class 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those railway‑focused categories, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words outside those listed scopes. The prosecution history shows an initial refusal, an examiner’s amendment and eventual registration on the Principal Register, but no supplemental‑register filing appears. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in any railway‑related goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.