Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE ELLINIKON, serial 79343100, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THE ELLINIKONSerial 79343100 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Lamda Development S.A.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 004 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 033 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 039 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Feb 01, 2022
Registered Jan 09, 2024
The record shows that “THE ELLINIKON” is a live Principal Register trademark owned by Lamda Development S.A., a Greek société anonyme, and it has been registered since January 9 2024. The registration covers a very broad mix of items, from perfumed soaps, candles, sunglasses and software for travel concierge services, through jewellery, paper packaging, clothing, olive‑oil foods, non‑alcoholic drinks, advertising and business consulting, real‑estate and construction services, to hotel, restaurant, spa and security‑guard services. Because the goods and services span many classes, a similar name used for any of those categories would raise the closest record‑based concern; uses outside those listed areas are farther from the scope but are not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history shows an initial refusal for descriptiveness in early 2023, followed by amendment and eventual registration on the Principal Register, which simply reflects the USPTO’s examination path. The most recent meaningful event is the registration notice on January 9 2024; no future deadline appears in the data. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I’d treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that overlaps the listed goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.