Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELSA LA QUALITÉ BABILOU ENVIRONNEMENT LUDIQUE SÉCURISÉ ET APPRENANT, serial 79378469, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELSA LA QUALITÉ BABILOU ENVIRONNEMENT LUDIQUE SÉCURISÉ ET APPRENANTSerial 79378469 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Babilou services
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jul 20, 2023
Registered Feb 11, 2025
The record shows a live, Principal Register service mark owned by Babilou services (société à responsabilité limitée, France) that was filed on July 20, 2023 and entered registration on February 11, 2025, with the most recent status event being the confirmation of registration on that same date. The mark covers three classes: Class 035 advertising and business services such as public‑relations consulting and rental of advertising space; Class 041 education and entertainment services focused on leadership development, safety, health, hygiene and well‑being training for teachers, childcare professionals, early‑childhood administrators, parents and children; and Class 045 legal and personal services including security‑guard services, physical‑security consulting, intellectual‑property advice and babysitting. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these listed areas, especially the education‑training and security‑service descriptions, because the record’s protection is limited to those specific goods and services and does not extend to unrelated fields. The prosecution history shows an initial refusal that was later overcome by an examiner’s amendment, after which the mark was allowed onto the Principal Register; this sequence simply reflects the USPTO’s examination process and does not imply any special status beyond being a standard registered mark. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions, so no visible enforcement signal appears. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name in any of the described advertising, educational or security‑related services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.