Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TEEZ-MON, serial 79385180, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TEEZ-MONSerial 79385180 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: LEGS COMPANY, LTD.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Jan 19, 2023
The record shows that the mark “TEEZ‑MON” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant, Legs Company, Ltd., a corporation organized in Japan, failed to respond to an Office action. The abandoned application covered a wide range of goods and services, including cosmetics, cleaning preparations, electrical apparatus, paper goods, clothing, kitchenware, food items, beverages, advertising services, and hospitality services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the broad areas of cosmetics, cleaning products, and general consumer goods, where the mark’s description overlaps with the goods listed. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the abandoned application’s scope. No enforcement activity appears in the supplied history. The latest event is the abandonment notice mailed on August 2, 2024. For anyone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of confusion in the listed goods and services, especially in cosmetics and cleaning products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.