Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NINTENDO, serial 79421950, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NINTENDOSerial 79421950 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: Nintendo of America Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Nov 21, 2024
Registered Feb 24, 2026
The record shows that the mark “NINTENDO” is live and registered on the Principal Register, owned by Nintendo of America Inc., a corporation organized in Washington. The registration covers a broad range of electronic gaming goods and services, including recorded and downloadable video game programs, game cartridges, memory cards, and related accessories, as well as various game‑related toys, educational and entertainment services, and online content. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the gaming and entertainment sectors, especially where the goods or services overlap with those listed. This record does not grant control over every use of the word “Nintendo” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history indicates a refusal in July 2025, followed by amendments and eventual registration in February 2026, showing the mark’s progression to the Principal Register. No opposition or enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The latest status event is the registration confirmation on February 24, 2026. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that use in gaming or entertainment could be viewed as infringing or confusingly similar to this well‑established mark.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.