Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOVE&JOY, serial 79423429, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE&JOYSerial 79423429 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Dzaboeva Oksana Anatolyevna
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Apr 09, 2025
The record shows that the mark “LOVE&JOY” is dead, having been abandoned after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Dzaboeva Oksana Anatolyevna. The goods covered are a broad range of cosmetics and cleaning products, including abrasives, essential oils, air fragrancing preparations, lip glosses, body glitter, and many other related items. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the cosmetics and cleaning category, especially where the goods overlap with those listed. This record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the abandoned application’s scope. The prosecution history shows a refusal in November 2025 followed by abandonment in May 2026, with no evidence of enforcement actions. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on May 13, 2026. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces immediate risk, but the broad cosmetics and cleaning goods listed still present a potential concern if the name is used in that area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.