Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HOUSE OF MANUS, serial 79428831, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HOUSE OF MANUSSerial 79428831 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Brand Leadership Management AG
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Mar 25, 2025
The record shows that the mark “HOUSE OF MANUS” is dead, having been abandoned after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Brand Leadership Management AG, an AG organized in Switzerland, and the mark was filed under the Madrid Protocol on March 25 2025. The goods and services covered are extensive, ranging from printed matter such as books, magazines, and instructional materials (class 016) to advertising, business consulting, and financial services (classes 035, 036), as well as educational, scientific, and technological services (classes 041, 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these areas, especially where printed or educational materials are involved. The record does not give the mark control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the specific classes listed. The prosecution history shows a refusal and subsequent abandonment, with no evidence of enforcement actions. The last status event was the abandonment notice on May 11 2026. For anyone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the broad goods and services still present a potential concern if used in those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.