Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BANDAI NAMCO, serial 79430752, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BANDAI NAMCOSerial 79430752 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Kabushiki Kaisha Bandai Namco Holdings
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 007 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 014 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 028 -
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 21, 2025
The record shows a pending application for the mark BANDAI NAMCO on the Principal Register, filed by Kabushiki Kaisha Bandai Namco Holdings on April 21, 2025, and most recently updated on July 17, 2026 when the applicant’s response to a non‑final Office action was entered. The application covers a very wide range of goods, from cosmetics and cleaning products (class 003) and industrial machines (class 007) to video‑game machines, toys, clothing, food items, retail services and entertainment rentals across dozens of classes. Because the goods and services span many categories, a similar name used for products or services that fall within any of these listed classes would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside these classes are farther from the scope shown. The prosecution history shows an initial refusal followed by an amendment and a response, but the mark remains pending and has not yet been placed on the Supplemental Register. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a similar name for any of the listed goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.