Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BABY JELLYCAT, serial 79431403, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BABY JELLYCATSerial 79431403 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Jellycat Limited
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 006 -
Class 008 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 012 -
Class 014 -
Class 015 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Aug 28, 2024
The record shows the mark “BABY JELLYCAT” is currently pending on the Principal Register, owned by Jellycat Limited, a UK‑based limited company. The application covers a broad range of goods, including baby cosmetics, toiletries, cleaning products, baby food, diapers, baby clothing, toys, musical instruments, and various baby accessories such as strollers and car seats. The closest concern for a similar name would arise in any of these baby‑related categories, especially cosmetics, toys, or baby apparel, where the mark’s distinctive combination of “BABY” and “JELLYCAT” is most relevant. This record does not grant control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the specific goods listed. The prosecution history shows a refusal on October 28, 2025, followed by a response and further examination, indicating the mark is still under review. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is highest in baby‑cosmetics, toys, or apparel, and lower in unrelated fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.