Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BANDAI TABLETOP GAMES, serial 79442155, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BANDAI TABLETOP GAMESSerial 79442155 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: KABUSHIKI KAISHA BANDAI (BANDAI Co., Ltd.)
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 24, 2025
The record shows a live, pending application for the service mark BANDAI TABLETOP GAMES filed by KABUSHIKI KAISHA BANDAI (BANDAI Co., Ltd.) and currently sitting in the Principal Register under examination; the most recent activity is the applicant’s response to a non‑final Office action entered on Aug 31 2026. The application covers a broad set of services in classes 038 (communication services such as transmission of games and related content over the Internet), 041 (education and entertainment services including online instruction, live tabletop‑game events, and non‑downloadable computer‑game entertainment) and 042 (technology services like toy design, software development, SaaS platforms for tabletop‑game event sign‑ups and server hosting). A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for any of those listed services, especially online gaming or tabletop‑event platforms, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “BANDAI,” “TABLETOP,” or “GAMES.” The prosecution history shows a refusal followed by a response and continued examination, but there is no indication of a Supplemental Register filing. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a comparable mark in the same digital‑gaming or entertainment space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.