Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LE MANS CLASSIC HERITAGE 1923-1975, serial 79444950, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LE MANS CLASSIC HERITAGE 1923-1975Serial 79444950 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Automobile Club de l'Ouest (A.C.O)
Class 006 -
Class 012 -
Class 014 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Dec 29, 2025
The record shows that “LE MANS CLASSIC HERITAGE 1923‑1975” is a pending application on the Principal Register owned by Automobile Club de l’Ouest (A.C.O), a French association. The mark covers a wide range of goods and services, including metal works, vehicles and vehicle parts, jewelry, clothing, and a broad array of educational and entertainment services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of these areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with the listed categories. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the scope shown in the application. The prosecution history shows a non‑final refusal issued on June 18 2026, indicating the examiner has raised objections that the applicant must address. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. The next consequential date is the auto‑protection date of September 5 2027. For someone considering a similar name, the presence of this pending mark in such broad classes suggests a meaningful risk of conflict if the name is used in related fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.