Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LE MANS CLASSIC LE MANS CLASSIC LEGEND 1976-2015, serial 79447126, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LE MANS CLASSIC LE MANS CLASSIC LEGEND 1976-2015Serial 79447126 · Principal Register
Pending · Under Examination
Owner: Automobile Club de l'Ouest (A.C.O)
Class 006 -
Class 012 -
Class 014 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Dec 29, 2025
The record shows that the mark “LE MANS CLASSIC LE MANS CLASSIC LEGEND 1976-2015” is currently pending on the Principal Register, owned by the Automobile Club de l’Ouest (A.C.O), a French association. The goods listed cover a wide range of automotive and related items, including vehicles, tires, engines, and vehicle parts, as well as jewelry, clothing, and various educational and entertainment services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the automotive and vehicle‑parts categories, where the mark is specifically described. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording; it is limited to the goods and services listed. The prosecution history shows a non‑final refusal was issued on June 20, 2026, and the applicant has yet to respond, so the mark remains pending. No enforcement actions are visible in the supplied history. If you are considering a similar name, be aware that use in the automotive or related fields could trigger a potential conflict.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.