Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for EMOJI THE ICONIC BRAND, serial 79975523, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
EMOJI THE ICONIC BRANDSerial 79975523 · Principal Register
Live · Registered
Owner: emoji company GmbH
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 008 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 010 -
Class 011 -
Class 012 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 017 -
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 022 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 026 -
Class 027 -
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Class 031 -
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 033 -
Class 034 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Dec 14, 2017
Registered Mar 02, 2021
The record shows that “EMOJI THE ICONIC BRAND” is a live, registered mark on the Principal Register, owned by emoji company GmbH, a limited liability company organized in Germany. The mark covers a wide range of goods and services, including cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, electrical apparatus, clothing, food and beverages, advertising services, and many other classes. A similar name would raise the closest concern for uses in any of these classes, especially in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, or advertising, where the mark’s scope is most directly applied. The record does not grant control over every use of the wording; it only protects the specific goods and services listed. The latest status event is the registration date of March 2, 2021, and no further maintenance dates are supplied. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the risk is that using it in any of the listed classes could create a meaningful concern for infringement.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.