Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PULP BUSINESS, serial 85003683, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PULP BUSINESSSerial 85003683 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Intelligent Business Entertainment Inc.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 31, 2010
The record shows that “PULP BUSINESS” is an abandoned application (status dead) that was filed by Intelligent Business Entertainment Inc., a Delaware corporation, and it never moved beyond the Principal Register because the applicant did not file a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance; the abandonment was recorded on May 26 2014. The only goods and services listed are in International Class 041 and focus on education and entertainment‑related offerings such as book publishing, business education and training programs, executive coaching, keynote presentations, digital video and audio publishing, continuing business programs on broadcast and online platforms, magazine and e‑zine publishing, and blogs featuring business content. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for any of those business‑training or publishing services, but the record does not give the owner control over unrelated goods or over the word “business” in other contexts. The prosecution history shows the application proceeded to a Notice of Allowance in October 2012, then the applicant sought extensions for filing a Statement of Use before ultimately abandoning the mark. No oppositions, cancellations, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable business‑education or publishing brand, but the risk is limited to the specific services listed.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.